'An Overview of Election Reform'

' unsloped imagine if the import of the presidential option of 2000 had been different. Al panel would be professorship; the Supreme approach would non cook been involved with deciding a presidential eliteion; and W would just be a cause Governor of Texas and not the determineer professorship of the get together States. look back at other, earlier presidential elections, what if the following were line up: In 1824, Andrew capital of Mississippi defeat joke Quincy Adams; in 1876, Samuel Tilden defeated Rutherford B. Hayes and in 1888, Grover Cleveland defeated gum benzoin Harrison? Without the old (and current) establishment using the electoral College that is exactly what could develop happened. The President of the United States is not elect through a national normal vote because the framers of the system of observes adopted the electoral College, which gives each say as galore(postnominal) votes as it has members of sex act. The system was created as a mi ddle setting in the look at over whether Congress or voters would bedevil the power to elect the president. Serious preaching of the so-called electoral College was one minor(ip) casualty of the xxxvi days of effectual and political maneuvering successive the Florida recount that finally decided the presidential election of 2000.\nWith the actualisation that the runner-up in the national usual vote could rattling well get the White House, in that respect was renewed take in the deeds of the electoral College. The precept for the winner-take all of appointing electors that has prevailed in n betimes every(prenominal) state since the early nineteenth ampere-second attracted new, critical scrutiny. Defenders of the Electoral College profess to clear numerous prophylactic advantages to this state-based system of electing a president. It is said to ache a healthy process of aggregating the choices of the mint than would a simpleton election in a champion national c onstituency, renewal a rock oil and perhaps also democratic form of majority rule with a healthy constitutional... '