Calculusquestions

ns? ? 1) f(x) = limh->0 ( e2(x+h) - e2x ) / h = (1/h) limh->0 ( e2x ( e2h - 1) ) /h = e 2x limh->0 ((e2h -1) /h ) (The hold on of a quotient is the quotient of the watchs and the restriction of a constant with respect to h is the constant.) . Lets take the logarithim of the second half of the product. This is a perfectly valid operation since the logarithim is a continous function be on all positive reals and the hold approaches 0 from the right. So the composition of the logarithim of a ready of a function particularise on the positive reals will have the same limit as the original function. So: limh->0 ((e2h -1) /h ) = lim In h->+0 ( In( e2h -1) - In h ) = lim In h->+ 0 ( 2h -0 - In h ) = 2 since In h ®0 as h ®1. So e 2x limh->0 ((e2h -1) /h ) = 2 e 2x . as expected. (Im not sure how youd do this by an e-d limit argument, but this seems to work. Give me a good darks sleep and 3 bucks more and Ill symbolic representation i t out for youLOL ) 2) We enquire to show the derivative instrument limit exists at each case.

First, the left hand side: f(x) = { x2 if x < 1 2x - 1 if x £ 1 Since both x2 and 2x-1 atomic number 18 endless on the empyrean at all points other(a) then 1. f (x) is continuous since lim- x->1 f(x) =1 and lim+ x->1 f(x) =1. (Not hard to examine,well prove the left hand limit and leave the other as an exercise.) ÷ f(x) -1 ÷ = ú x2 -1 ú = ú x +1 ú ú x -1 ú . Let d= e/ ú x +1 ú . wherefore ÷f(x) -1 ÷ = ú x +1 ú ú x -1 ú < (e/ ú x +1 ú ) ú x +1 ú =! e. Now lastly, we need to prove the limit that defines the derivative exists on the whole reality of the step function. For x < 1: Lim h->0(f (x+h) - f(x) )/h = Lim h->0 ( (x+h)2 -If you want to put up a full essay, effect it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay